Pressdemocrat.com
Conversations
Town Hall/News Discussion
California Politics
It's state budget time
Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
|
|
And even the normally Democrat hugging Sacramento Bee has already concluded two immutable truths;
* The budget won't get done on time * We, the taxpayers, are screwed
The full article at The Sacramento Bee |
||
|
here's two ideas for balancing the budget:
1. cut funding to the Illegals 2. cut the pay of politicians to less than 100K a year if you see a light at the end of the tunnel, it's just a photon torpedo |
||||
|
|
|
1.) don't pay the capons a cent during the time the budget isn't passed. No pay, no per diem. Don't get it retroactively either.
2.) slap them with breach of contract suits. The promise to uphold the Constituion of the State of CA. They fail to do that. Contract is void. subjoe Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error. |
|||
|
you guys JUST DON"T GET IT" here is the new plan -tax "the rich" -demonize the job producers -regulate -increase fees -give large raises and promises to government workers -extend benefits for government employees beyond anything private industry can responsibly employ -blame everyone else VOTE FOR ME...OH AND DARE TO DREAM and "HAVE THE AUDACITY OF HOPE" |
||||
|
Hmmm, well that is one way of putting it. Particularly since the budget does not account for the rising cost of fuel that will affect schools, fire, cops, spraying for moths, basically everything and then some. Since I am not particularly fond of the idea of passing on debt to the next generation I am not big on the idea of more bonds. Nor do I believe that betting on future lottery and “gaming” revenues is a good idea (for multiple reasons). That leaves us with the 2 broad categories of tightening the belt and raising “revenues”. I think we need to expect both of them. As opposed to some here I don’t think we should place an unrealistic cap ($100K) on what all legislatores get paid - that would only encourage more corruption. One of the big problems as I see it is the special interests. I propose a PAC tax. All lobbyists pay a fee for any time they spend communicating with anyone involved in the government. This includes personal or written communication. Individuals (taxpayers) would still be able to communicate with the elected folks in the same way we always have (impersonal calls and letters that if we are lucky get compiled into statistics). Obviously this is not going to solve the short term problem but it might help the long term one. I’m thinking off the top of my head here. What do the rest of you think? |
||||
|
The politicians are suppose to reflect the average person. The average person when the money gets tight doesn't stop spending, they use credit cards and then hope they get a raise.
Are politicians are doing the same thing, except they can give themselves a raise by raising taxes. I am not rich so raising taxes on the rich does sound bad. I am not a immigrant so why not go after them. I rarely use a bridge, so that sounds good. I don't smoke, gamble or drink a lot so sin tax them. I don't build or improves houses so fee people to death. Oh wait I do own a house, own and drive a car, buy stuff, make money and even have a phone or two. Oh know......they are asking me to get them a raise....thats crap. |
||||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed
Pressdemocrat.com
Conversations
Town Hall/News Discussion
California Politics
It's state budget time© 2008 The Press Democrat

