A U.S. District Court judge has dismissed one of Orly Taitz's birther lawsuits, saying it would be unconstitutional for the courts to "effectively overthrow a sitting president."

In his ruling, Judge David O. Carter said the plaintiffs, represented by Taitz, had asked the courts to go outside their constitutional power by demanding President Obama produce further documentation proving he was born in the United States, and if he couldn't, shutting down the federal government and holding an election.

"Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction," Carter wrote. "Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic."

In another of Taitz's birther cases, a judge fined her $20,000 for "abus[ing] her privilege to practice law" by bringing suits "without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law." Taitz has said she won't pay.

Source

Multi-generational inbreeding.

--
Trying to have an argument with some people is like trying to teach a pig to sing: it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.

I actually feel sorry for her. She is a little nutty. I watched her one evening being interviewed and cringed through the entire thing. It was very sad and difficult to watch.

Oh, like there has never been a Judge bought off?
Even you, oh raving liberal b!tch, have to admit that Obama's producing a band of lawyers, instead of a simple valid Birth Certificate is off the wall.
It stinks to high heaven!
Oh, sorry, I forgot you are a heathen.
OK, it sure raises the eyebrow of any thinking person.
Even my kids who were born at home (into my hands) have valid Birth Certificates. I knew they would someday need them.
Where is Obama's? Why is it such a task to prove he is a citizen?
The question will always remain.

Easy there PIE!!! Even your friend Bill O'Reilly won't have the "Crazy" on his show. He has provided at birth certificate. It wasn't an original. I don't have my original I have a certified copy from the County of Sonoma.

Why so nasty? Resorting to name calling, REALLY? Grow-up

Original Birth Certificates are easily obtained IF you have one on record with the agency you claim contains yours. Mine is glued into my baby book and has footprints made at time of birth. That is how Santa Rosa did it, so why don't you have an original? Even certified copies have a seal. Where is Obama's?
Just because O'Reilly is not a "birther" does not prove anything other than O'Reilly has his own opinion. He also has opinions contrary to mine about a lot of things. So, what's your point?

As for "being nasty", that seems to be how you approached everyone on this site that you don't agree with. Deal with it. Your own medicine tastes nasty, huh?

quote:

Originally posted by pie:
Oh, like there has never been a Judge bought off?
Even you, oh raving liberal b!tch, have to admit that Obama's producing a band of lawyers, instead of a simple valid Birth Certificate is off the wall.
It stinks to high heaven!
Oh, sorry, I forgot you are a heathen.
OK, it sure raises the eyebrow of any thinking person.
Even my kids who were born at home (into my hands) have valid Birth Certificates. I knew they would someday need them.
Where is Obama's? Why is it such a task to prove he is a citizen?
The question will always remain.

O'Rly?




When you're a mental midget, every molehill looks like a mountain.

Obama and the State of Hawaii have produced more than adequate documenation. One would have to believe that there was a VAST left-wing conspiracy in the year that Obama was born to forge his birthplace so that, eventually, he could run for President. Um... sure.

And those conspirators had REMARKABLE powers of seeing into the future. Even in 1961, they had foresight to plant counterfeit birth anouncements in, count 'em, THREE Honolulu newspapers. Amazing. Just astounding. This woman makes Joan Crawford look sane.



--
Prejudices are what fools use for reason. ~ Voltaire

Judge Carter, "The writ of Quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that District."

Orly's case does have merit!

Link

That is where all the cases against Obama needs to be filed. Three of her plaintiffs did have standing. So, it was in the wrong Court!

Anyway there is a BIG CASE COMING AGAINST THE HAWAII'S AG! So it sounds like that AG is in deep water for leaking private information on you know who! So it looks like the AG of Hawaii could loose her job, or show the B.C.! Chances are they will have to release it anyway sense she spilled the BEANS!

WIRE

In the beginning I did not think too much about this birth certificate debate, but as time goes on and the refusal of Obama to allow proper research of the (phony) documents he claims prove his birthplace I started to wonder. Then the amount of money spent on keeping any real documents hidden is further reason to make anyone wonder....now finding dots being connected from Obama to this Judge....hhhmmm.
Not exactly comforting.

And yes, I have to wonder about "documents" (copies) with dates that indeed could be altered are not "proof" of anything. I have seen phony newspapers printed to commemorate events as souvenirs. I also believe that with the power that comes from being President of the United States, people can and do plan ahead and conspire, and that can involve some pretty shady stuff.
Until and unless Obama stops "dithering" and paying to hide this issue from public, I too will now wonder about his legitimacy to the position he now holds.

No legitimate proof.
No birth certificate.
No copy of one, much less a certified copy of one.
Fool yourself, you aren't fooling me.
Watch and see what your darling does in December, when he gives America away to his cronies abroad.
You are really too ignorant for my time.
People like you are why this country is being destroyed.
Better to be a dead Patriot, than to be a mindless lobotomized prune like you are.
You are pathetic and beyond hope.

Hillgal - your baby book birth certificate - the one's with the footprints - is one issued by the hospital. Although it is an original document it has no legal standing as proof of birth. It is a strictly a ceremonial document. Pretty writing, the hospital logo, fancy seal, footprints, the whole nine yards but it is not a legal document. Suitable for framing or a baby book. The legal one is filed with the county registrar and held by them. You can only get a certified copy of it not the original. Same with death certificates and marriage certificates.

Not all hospitals issue one nowadays. I have one too and I also thought it was my birth certificate when I went to get a passport. Come to find out it is an unacceptable document, only for show. I needed a legal certification of live birth that is issued by the county which is an official certified copy.

Look up the rules and you will see what you have is just a pretty document - much like the college degree diploma I have. Proof of graduation is actually held by the college.

ken, so far that "pretty document" has been sufficient for any proof required by requesting agency. Law enforcement,government agencies, DMV,probate court.....so far I have not tried to obtain a passport, so that may be an issue. Otherwise, it IS a legally accepted document. The only hassle is having to take the baby book with me to have the document scanned/copied. It's glued into the book.

kenk, I had no problem obtaining a copy of my original birth certificate. Obama says his is on file but he refuses to produce it.

At issue is whether Obama is LEGALLY the sitting President. He continues to fight back against any attempt to verify that.

John McCain, in contrast, produced his documentation when the question arose regarding his status.

This is an alarming assertion by a court:

quote:

A U.S. District Court judge has dismissed one of Orly Taitz's birther lawsuits, saying it would be unconstitutional for the courts to "effectively overthrow a sitting president."

That means that even if the President is legally PROHIBITED from serving, once he has been sworn in, a court of law no longer has the authority to examine the evidence to determine whether the law has been violated. That is completely wrong.

Obama's Presidency is a COUP!

Thank you, Leftists in this forum, for letting us know where you stand on this. You will be ranked among those who put the likes of Hitler, Mao, Lenin and Castro into power.

Hillgal - you were lucky that they accepted your hospital birth certificate because it is not acceptable proof. Even little league requires a certified copy of a birth record issued by a governmental agency. So does the Department of State as well as DMV. Local, state and federal employment also require proof of birth by a certified copy held by the vital records department in the county where you were born. You cannot get nor view an original certificate only certified copies are available.

Speak - I wouldn't expect you would have had a problem getting a certified copy of your birth registration. It's pretty easy but we've been around the ranch before with this Obama issue so there is no need to go there - your argument and rationale have not changed. It would just be another worthless circle jerk. By the way, you just violated Godwin's law with your Nazi reference thus losing the debate on the issue. Only took 12 posts on this topic to get there - usually you do it in less than five.

By the way Speak, Nazi doctrine is generally accepted by the extreme far right. Communist doctrine is generally accepted by the extreme far left. They share a few common ideals but they are in direct conflict with each other. Remember WWII? Nazi's and Communists hate each other and still do. You tend to use this terminology collectively and interchangeably thus confusing your position. If you don't believe this go and attend an American Nazi party meeting, claim you're a Communist and see what happens - I will await your obituary.

quote:

Originally posted by kenk91645:
By the way Speak, Nazi doctrine is generally accepted by the extreme far right. Communist doctrine is generally accepted by the extreme far left. They share a few common ideals but they are in direct conflict with each other. Remember WWII? Nazi's and Communists hate each other and still do. You tend to use this terminology collectively and interchangeably thus confusing your position. If you don't believe this go and attend an American Nazi party meeting, claim you're a Communist and see what happens - I will await your obituary.

Since you're a loony LIBTARD you and Loony Annie need to hook up. She's lonely for ya!

How about moving to your paradise - North Korea?